Reading World History from the Theology of the Cross
Onward and
upward is the hope of any and every people group no matter how large or small.
Human betterment is an obvious and understandable goal for all to aspire to.
The church too sends out missionaries and other workers to aid in such
betterment. Sometimes we’re even tempted to believe it might just happen! And
in certain ways and places it has.
Yet even as
the church engages in such work for human betterment, we (should) live by a
theology of ministry that follows Jesus’ own pattern of engagement – a cruciform,
or cross-centered, pattern. His resurrection validated and vindicated this
cruciform pattern of life for Jesus’ followers between his ascension and
return.
And that’s
where the rub comes for many of us. We seem to think that Jesus’ victory
through his resurrection means that his followers in history will (or should)
be victorious too. That is, we believe the church should be
-a
cultural power,
-a
moral exemplar and judge, and
-a
major contributor to human betterment,
Individually,
we expect much the same. We expect we will be
-reputable
and respectable people,
-successful
strivers against sin, and
-beacons
or wisdom for human living.
This approach
has been dubbed a “theology of glory.” Here victory is present and evident in
our life in the world in at least enough measure for us to see and others to
notice. Some expect the world to progress to better and better. But those who
don’t nevertheless tend to expect the church will be as described above.
One could make
many responses to this scenario. The one I want to focus on here is the church
being minted follower in the pattern of Jesus’ own cross-centered engagement with
the world. We have not thought well or hard enough about this by and large.
What might it mean for us to engage our world the way Jesus’ did?
-we will like
him find our most appropriate “home” among the last and the least and the lost.
We may become one with the “deplorables” and disrespectful. In other words, a
favorite of our current president, the “losers.”
-we experience
the victory of Jesus’ resurrection as a losing of our lives (sometimes
literally) for Jesus’ sake. The church father Tertullian said the blood of the
martyrs was the seedbed of the church. The Greek word martyr means witness and suggests that our witness will provoke
resistance rather than being received as wisdom for human living or betterment.
-though we may
share in making some inroads in working for human betterment in the world, we
will “win” the world for God through sharing in Jesus’ death in hope of
resurrection beyond what we can hope or imagine.
It is, of
course, Dietrich Bonhoeffer, who has in the modern world (along with MLK, Jr.,
Oscar Romero and a host of others) embodied such a “theology of the cross” or “Discipleship
for Losers” for us to examine and emulate. I will leave it to you to pursue
their examples. I will leave you with
the conviction Bonhoeffer articulated and
lived: faith is the sharing in God’s sufferings in the world.
And that’s our
victory cry in the world. As the hymn “Lift
High the Cross” puts it:
So shall our song of triumph ever be:
praise to the Crucified for victory! Lift high the cross, the love of Christ proclaim
till all the world adore his sacred name.
praise to the Crucified for victory! Lift high the cross, the love of Christ proclaim
till all the world adore his sacred name.
So we do not read our world’s history as a story of ever
greater progress and betterment. Nor as a “tale told by an idiot” that bears no
meaning. Rather, it is those who bear the cross of Jesus, sharing in God’s own
sufferings in world, and give their lives, reputations, ambitions, resources,
and everything they have for the life of the world God loves to the uttermost that bear its meaning and hope.
Comments
Post a Comment