Marginal Christianity

  Book Summary Endorsements The Audience of I&I I&I and the Authority of Scripture NPR Interview I&I and Inerrancy Responding to Critics » A Response to Paul Helm Responses to Some General Criticism of I&I Criticism 1: I&I Is Inconsistent with the Reformed Faith Criticism 2: I&I Ignores Other Possible Solutions Criticism 3: I&I Denies Inerrancy Criticism 4: I&I Lacks Precision and Clarity Criticism 5: I&I Has Been Criticized by Some Important Scholars Responses to Other Critical Reviews Interactions with Bruce Waltke » My response to the Introduction of Bruce Waltke’s surrejoinder to my response above. Bruce Waltke’s Revisiting Inspiration and Incarnation. A Response to Richard Pratt » Pratt 2 Pratt 3 Pratt 4 Pratt 5 I&I and Westminster Theological Seminary » I&I and the Westminster Confession of Faith My Response from the Westminster Theological Journal (Spring 2009) Christianity Today Coverage ...

  3 https://www.blogger.com/blogger.g?blogID=8024463059512837285#editor   January 7, 2014   By   Peter Enns   15 Comments Apparently,   Bible reading   is way down in churches, and   Biblica  has dug into finding out why. Here’s what I learned at the   conference I attended last week sponsored by Biblica (see  here ). Bible reading is down because people read it in fragments, a-historically, in isolation. In fragments,  meaning in the verse level rather than in large sections. A focus on verses not only encourages prooftexting but  prevents readers from seeing the larger points of biblical works–whether we are talking about a letter like Romans, or large narratives such as we find in the   Old Testament . To remedy this problem, Biblica has formatted the NIV (New International Version, 2011) without chapter and verse numbers,   calling   it   The Books of the Bible , which...