The Spirit of the Red Letters and “Progressive Evangelicalism”
Daniel Kirk has moved to the Progressive Chanel at Patheos. And that’s great for him. Really, I’m happy. It seems like it will be a good fit for him. That said, without wanting to pick on him, I had a quibble about his recent post on why he’s a “ Progressive Evangelical .” You can read the whole thing, but here’s the conclusion that sums it up: In the end, I’m an evangelical because the Bible will always haunt me as the authoritative articulation of the word of God we hold in our hands. But I’m a progressive because Jesus, not the Bible, is the ultimate authority to whom I must bow as a Christian—and I do not believe that the final, liberating word has yet been spoken, that the final, liberating action of God has yet been taken. So a commitment to the Jesus I meet on the pages of the Bible means that I must continue to enact the progressive ministry of Jesus and those who followed him. Okay. At first this sounds like an old-school, Red-Letter Jesus approach to thing...