A Brief Alphabet of Christianity and Politics (3)
Christological – Politics as practiced by Christians can only be a politics of Jesus (if it is to be truly Christian). And what we have become acutely aware of in recent days is that the Jesus whose politics we must follow is a “black Jesus.” And only a black person can tell us what Jesus might mean for them. And a fine black Christian Ethics professor at McCormick Theological Seminary, Reggie Williams has done so by exploring the concept of “blackness” and “whiteness” in relation to Jesus in his book Bonhoeffer’s Black Jesus: Harlem Renaissance Theology and an Ethic of Resistance. This intriguing and persuasive study focuses on the figure of the esteemed German theologian Dietrich Bonhoeffer and the impact his exposure to what he called “the American racial problem” had on him in the time he spent in New York in 1930-31. Williams has further published a series of facebook posts focusing on diagnosing the presence of white Jesus in light of present struggles with a resurgent white supremacy and white nationalism.
Dr.
J. Alfred Smith, senior pastor of Allen Temple Baptist Church in Oakland, CA
has said, “African-American spirituality is a spirituality that was born and
shaped in the heat of oppression and suffering. Blackness is a metaphor for
suffering. To know blackness is to be connected to the suffering, hope and
purpose of black people.”
Bonhoeffer’s
exposure to that suffering of black people in Harlem came largely through his
participation in the Abyssinian Baptist Church led by Adam Clayton Powell. His
time in New York sensitized him to such suffering in the black community and to
acute sensitivity to it in his homeland. In particular, his experiences disabused
him of the White Christ of the reigning European worldview and churches in his
time. “Bonhoeffer’s
encounter with the black Jesus in Harlem allowed him to empathize with the
suffering of marginalized people so deeply that, on his return to Germany, the
devilish spirit of Hitler’s National Socialism was readily apparent.”
“The practice of joining in with African
Americans in Harlem gave Bonhoeffer the ability to see more clearly the
distinction between a damaging theology of glory, represented by a white Christ
who refuses incarnation and empathy, and the healthier theology of the cross
that reveals the presence of God hidden in suffering.”
This
white Christ proved unable to diagnose the danger of Hitler. Indeed, its
churches attached their star to the Nazi Reich and became complicit in its
atrocities. Years later Bonhoeffer would write: “It remains an experience of
incomparable value that we have for once learned to see the great events of
world history from below, from the perspective of the outcasts, the suspects,
the maltreated, the powerless, the oppressed and reviled, in short from the
perspective of the suffering.” (Letters
and Papers from Prison, Kindle Location 1639)
Bonhoeffer
identifies the “gospel” of the White Christ and its churches in this reflection
also from his time in New York:
“In New York, they
preach about virtually everything; only one thing is not addressed, or is
addressed so rarely that I have as yet been unable to hear it, namely, the
gospel of Jesus Christ. … So what stands in place of the Christian message? An
ethical and social idealism borne by a faith in progress that — who knows how?
— claims the right to call itself “Christian.”[1]
It
was in the church in Harlem and the fellowship and sufferings of its people
Bonhoeffer heard and felt the gospel, the true gospel of black Jesus.
Reggie
Williams has recently posted a series of reflections extending his insights
from Bonhoeffer’s life to the hold white Jesus still has in many churches and
parts of America (fb 8.14.17).
What
does whiteness mean?
“It may be
safe to say that the predominant expression of Christianity within the United
States is devoted to a white Jesus. One does not need to be white to be a
devotee. Whiteness is about more than skin color, it is . . . historically
arranging human beings according to a hierarchy of human difference (worth)
with men defined as white on the top (in many black churches, masculinity alone
will count as prerequisite for placement on the top spot). White Jesus is the
ideological/theological justification of that ideology, representing the top of
the hierarchy, the perfect human--white, masculine, sovereign, risen with all
power--and the Christianity he represents is ideological support for that
biopolitical arrangement. He represents the values and ideals of white, Western
civilization, and his divinity is the justification for its righteousness, the
righteousness of white Western civilization, even the U.S. Constitution. He has
so embedded within whiteness that to trouble it is necessarily to engage
whiteness, and vice versa. Indeed, he is theological mobilization of
whiteness/white supremacy. This brand of Christianity will talk about racial
reconciliation and justice, using the tools of whiteness and white supremacy,
with the effect of securing the work of racism, making peace with the hierarchy.
They simply make nice with white supremacy. It's language of
"diversity" and "multiculturalism" doesn't finally address
the way it's very Christianity is shaped to identify white masculinity with
divinity, in the worship of White Jesus.”
Again,
“White
Jesus was born in Europe, not Bethlehem. There were slave boats named after
him, he had chapels on top of slave dungeons where people worshipped him, and
raped kidnapped, terrified African women. In the U.S. slave owners delivered
sermons about him, demanding obedience to him from their slaves. He was their
justification for kidnapping, genocide, slavery, rape, and a host of historical
brutalities. White Jesus is the Jesus born out of white sovereign European
imperial lust for blood and soil, and anywhere colonialism has lingered or left
its mark, Christians still love him.”
Yet again,
“White
Jesus emphasizes orthodoxy, omitting orthopraxis, and orthopathos (the
condition of one's heart towards
others, i.e. compassion). For him, Christian discipleship is bound up in
pedagogy and right belief, with little or nothing to do with concrete social
engagement with real human life.”
How
can we tell if White Jesus is our Jesus?
“If
the Christianity embraced at your church sees the goal of the gospel as saving
souls from a fiery hell, and matters like social justice, anti-racism, etc...
are distractions, your Jesus is white.”
“If
the Christianity embraced at your church makes personal/individual sin the
focus of Jesus' work and the goal of discipleship, and never talks about social
and systemic evil, your Jesus is white.”
“If
the Christianity embraced at your church makes a priority of "personal
relationship with Jesus," and talks about racism as a problem for
individuals, to be addressed within their hearts, your Jesus is white.”
“If the historical oppression of minoritized
people is "also sin," but not a primary focus of the mission of the
church, your Jesus is white.”
“If
as a Christian, you are able to see "beyond some of the flaws" of
this current administration (Trump), your Jesus is white.”
Comments
Post a Comment