Theological Journal - May 16: Three Songs with the Worst Lyrics *Theologicall Considered)
Theological Journal – May 16
It’s 4:15 a.m. and I can’t sleep. I heard a song on my phone
that made me think I ought to draw up a list of the most theologically rancid
and vacuous lyrics with popular tunes and well-sung by noted artists. Everyone
will have their own list. I have not included rap music because I don’t listen
to it though I understand there are plenty of objectionable lyrics in the, Nor
have I included country music because I don’t listen to it and have my doubts if
it is really music. Nor have I included Christian music for similar reasons (not
to be confused with music by Christians). My list comes from the pop rock music
of the 1980’s. That’s the last time I listened to music seriously. So here we
go!
1.
“The Greatest Love of All” by Whitney Houston.
Featuring Whitney’s characteristic and
classic intensity and range that few other singers can even imagine matching,
the insipid lyrics are as bad as Whitney’s voice is good. Self-love is the
greatest love of all, it’s easy to achieve, and of we can just teach our
children this and turn them loose to lead the world, everything will be
perfect, bigly perfect! Poppycock! as my friend Walk Jones might say. That’s
about as far from the real greatest love as the east is from the west (to use
the psalmist’s phrase. This sentimental claptrap should be avoided at all
costs.
2.
“From a Distance” by Bette Midler.
Here was have a classic American
theological instinct – keep God “at a distance” where everything seems peaceful
and in order. But at all costs, keep God from coming near into the muck and mire
and stench of real life. He can’t take it (we think) nor do we want him to.
Safely tucked away in heaven, we insulate ourselves from his real love and
holiness which means we have to change. The Divine Miss M sings this well, but
there is little truly divine here!
3.
“All You Need is Love” by the Beatles
Much as I like the Fab Four the
lyrics of this one is sentimentalism run amuck. We tried this gambit in 1960’s
and 1970’s with Situational Ethics (Joseph Fletcher). Love would direct us to
the right course of action in any particular situation. Of course, love as a
free-standing, abstract quality quickly proved itself not up to the task.
Questions immediately arise: what kind of love are you promoting, what vision
of the good funds that view of love, who are its exemplars who mentor us and
what community nurtures this kind of love in us? A vision of the good, a community
of mentors and support are necessary to fill out the sense of love we want to
promote. “Love” not nested in such a matrix is useless and probably
meaningless. We need a but more than love, friends.
Two songs just missed making the cut. “We are the World” is
the first. While emotionally compelling and creatively arranged and produced,
its lyrics belie the truth that the problem is precisely that “we are the
world.” The Babelian proposal that the world come together and solve its
problems and especially save the children is Babel-speak writ large and forgets
the unanimous testimony of history that it is a pipe-dream those in power use
to keep the poor and powerless down.
The other song is John Lennon’s “Imagine.” It didn’t make
the list because sometimes I can bring myself to take Lennon’s “imagine” in an eschatological
sense as the world we hope for but will realize only kn the next world but nevertheless
spurs such to action in this world to make a little more like the one we hope
for. I doubt that’s how Lennon meant it and as a proposal for living in this world
it is merely wishful thinking.
Well, no doubt I’ve offended most readers by now. That’s ok.
Give me your lists as an alternative. Let the fun begin!
Comments
Post a Comment