At-one-ment,
Not Atonement – Richard Rohr
The
common reading of the Bible is that Jesus “died for our sins”—either to pay a
debt to the devil (common in the first millennium) or to pay a debt to God
(proposed by Anselm of Canterbury, 1033-1109). Franciscan philosopher and
theologian John Duns Scotus (1266-1308) agreed with neither of these
understandings.
Duns
Scotus was not guided by the Temple language of debt, atonement, or blood
sacrifice (understandably used by the Gospel writers and by Paul). He was
inspired by the cosmic hymns in the first chapters of Colossians and Ephesians
and the Prologue to John’s Gospel (1:1-18) and gave a theological and
philosophical base to St. Francis’ deep intuitions of God’s love. While the
Church has not rejected the Franciscan position, it has been a minority view.
read more at: https://www.ptm.org/one-ment-not-atonement-richard-rohr
Comments
Post a Comment