The Marks of the Church Today
In the
movie “Remember the Titans” the coaches are preparing the newly-integrated team
for their first game. As they move
through their opening exercises, the head coach yells out “Who are we?” The team replies, “We are the Titans!” “What are we?” the coach yells back. “We are mobile, agile, and hostile!” the team
cries back. I would like to borrow this
threefold cry and add one further element to it as a way of articulating the “marks”
or chief and essential characteristics of the church in our world today.
Mobile,
agile, hostile, and I would add, fragile comprise my proposed marks. “Mobile” indicates the much-needed quality of
readiness to move – physically, in service, theologically, and in whatever
other ways are needed – that should mark a pilgrim people, those always “on the
way” to the kingdom of God. A mobile
church is a lean church, stripped down to its essentials, sitting light to
place and buildings, expecting the Spirit to move it to break boundaries and
cross barriers that exist between people and groups. Reconciliation is an always moving target and
God’s people are his “mobile response unit” for such service.
“Agile”
suggests flexibility and the suppleness to reach others around the barriers of
race, social status, respectability, tradition, denomination, language, and so
forth to forge new connections of solidarity and sharing enhancing
relationships and meeting need. This
capacity to reconfigure relationships and networks is critical to sustaining and
communicating our identity as God’s people and carrying out the ministry to
which we are called.
“Hostile”
does not immediately resonate as a mark of the church, especially in these
volatile and violent days in which religion is implicated in a tragic and embarrassing
degree. Yet, the truth is that God’s
people are on a mission in a hostile world.
Sin, evil, and death have ordered and insinuated themselves into the
warp and woof of human life lived in rebellion against God. From the intimacy of personal life to the
large-scale systems and forces that order human life at large, sin and its
manifold distortions mark the shape and tenor of our lives.
God’s people, I like to
call his “subversive, counter-revolutionary movement,” is that people equipped
and commissioned to undercut and sabotage the attitudes and patterns that sin
has set in place and demonstrate the new life, life as God originally intended
it. As such, we are a hostile people,
hostile to all that hinders and thwarts God’s intention for his world both
large and small. Our hostility is not
against people, however, but rather against “the principalities and powers,”
those rebellious and hostile powers Paul names (Eph.6:12) as standing behind
the disorder of God’s wayward creation.
Our weapon is the gospel, the announcement of God’s victory over these
powers of sin, evil, death, and the devil in Christ. We and use only the “violence of love”
(Archbishop Oscar Romero) to implement this victory in the world.
“Fragile” is my addition
to these marks. The church stands (or
should stand) is stubborn solidarity with the broken and hurting masses in our
world. If our hearts are not broken by
sharing God’s broken heart for his wounded world, we belie our calling and
confession (Matt.5:4). Fragility means
we live out of our own woundedness and journey toward healing in serving the
God who has called us. We call others to
share this journey with us in the name of the Christ by whose own wounds we are
healed (Isa.53). Fragility is the name
of the violence of love that forms our service, lubricates our agility, and
fires our mobility.
Fragility is the name of
the love of Christ within us. Mobility
is love’s mode of being in the world.
Agility is the form of our action with and towards others. And hostility names the aim of this
subversive, counter-revolutionary people – to erect signposts of justice, love,
and freedom that point to God’s coming new age and to announce and demonstrate
that this gracious rule is already present and possible for those who trust and
serve him. These four, I suggest, are
the marks of the church we ought seek in these days in which we live.
Comments
Post a Comment