When The Second Mountain is the Wrong One
David Brooks has produced another fine book. His skills of
analysis and synthesis are on full display in this work as in all his others.
Studded with insight The Second Mountain
can be read with profit by many different kinds of people. That said, this book
also shares a fundamental weakness with his other works, and, indeed, with all
other works of social analysis/self-improvement (and I don’t mean that
pejoratively), at least from a Christian perspective. Which is highly ironical
because the book reflects Brooks’ own journey toward a more explicit and deeper
grounding in an increasingly Christian faith.
Every so often, Brooks notes, you meet people who
radiate joy—who seem to know why they were put on this earth, who glow with a
kind of inner light. Life, for these people, has often followed what we might
think of as a two-mountain shape. They . . .begin climbing the mountain they
thought they were meant and were taught to climb: success, to make one’s mark, find
personal happiness. But if that happens, such folk are not satisfied. They
realize: This wasn’t my mountain after all. There’s another, bigger mountain
out there that is actually my mountain.
And so they take off on a new journey toward a second mountain, often around midlife. Now they pursue a self-centered rather than other-centered life, things that are truly worth wanting, A life of interdependence, not independence. A life characterized by commitment.
On the journey toward The Second Mountain, four commitments stand out:
And so they take off on a new journey toward a second mountain, often around midlife. Now they pursue a self-centered rather than other-centered life, things that are truly worth wanting, A life of interdependence, not independence. A life characterized by commitment.
On the journey toward The Second Mountain, four commitments stand out:
-to
a spouse and family,
-to
a vocation,
-to
a philosophy or faith, and
-to
a community.
Our execution of these commitments leads to personal
fulfillment, meaning, and ultimately happiness. Brooks probes the lives of
those he considers well on this journey and collects and sifts their wisdom for
it.
As I said, all this is helpful and worth considering,
especially so since Brooks is trying to think and evaluate his (and our) lives
anew from a more Christian viewpoint. This is where I find the problem. Brooks
is fundamentally right using the (well-worn) trope of a journey for life. But
the life he seeks is not, Christianly considered, a morality, an ethic, or even
a commitment of the kind we usually consider. And the commitment it is overturns
all other commitments.
And it’s climbing the
mountain of that commitment that constitutes the true mountain of our lives.
Dietrich Bonhoeffer is one of our best guides for the journey to and onto this
mountain. That’s why his guidance to it, so divergent from Brook’s, is so
important. He describes this journey as one that is exclusive, eccentric, and
epical. He writes: "There
is no other (exclusive) rule or test for one who is a member of the people of
God or the church of Christ that this: where there is a little band of those
who accept this word of the Lord (eccentric), teach it purely and witness
against those who persecute it, and for that reason suffer (epical) what is
their due.'"
--No Rusty Swords
A peculiar relationship, one that
decenters us from the direction-setting, decision-making role in life, and
catches us up in a durable, risky, and dangerous adventure in a people of long
history and memory with God in whom to play our (gifted) role is life’s highest
privilege and necessity.
The Bible’s God often highlights
himself on mountains. Eden (Ez.28:13-16), Sinai, Carmel, the end-times mountain
and temple (Ez.40-48; Rev.21-22), Sermon on Mount, for example. Brooks is right
to seek God/the good life on a mountain. He just hasn’t found the right one
yet. For there is one more “mountain”/hill where God is found in exemplary
fashion living out himself the life he offers, expects, and enables for us:
Skull Hill, Golgatha, the place of Jesus’ crucifixion. And that life lies
beyond all rule, precept, principle, formula, or law. It lies instead deep in
the heart of God, deep in the heart of the love that made, makes, and will make
work out as God intends.
Brooks’ second mountain is a perfectly acceptable,
even desirable, way to live. Obviously better than most of us do. But it is not
that mountain where what Brooks finally seeks is found. That on a little hill
outside Jerusalem with the rejected and treasonous are found executed. When the
people of God find their destiny on that hill, rejected and despised as that
will make them to the world’s powers, they will have found their “second
mountain.”
Comments
Post a Comment