Psalm 7 (Post 10)
Notes
-Last in a series of five laments
after the two introductory sins (Pss.1 & 2)
-theme
of refuge ties this psalm back to 2:12. “Taking refuge in the Lord or making the Lord
one’s refuge is a favorite and frequent metaphor in the psalms for the
religious act of trusting one’s life to the care of God in uncertain or
threatening situations. . . . The prayer itself is a way of
taking shelter in the providence and salvation of God.” (Mays, James Luther. The Lord Reigns: A Theological Handbook to the Psalms. Louisville:
Westminster John Knox, 1994, 63)
-God
the judge (vv.6, 11) is highlighted here.
-Again, we do not know the
specificities of attack here. Gerstenberger writes: “Psalm 7 . . . as well as the other laments, does not
report a single incident, for instance, of somebody being accused of theft.
Rather, the complaint represents an accumulation of the agonies
of generations of supplicants facing unfounded charges of various types.” (Gerstenberger, Erhard S. Psalms: Part 1, with an Introduction to Cultic Poetry. FOTL 14.
Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1988, 64)
-Structure: Appeal for rescue and vow of innocence (vv. 1-5); Appeal for
vindication and justice (vv. 6-9); Confession of trust in God’s righteousness
(vv. 10-16); Closing vow to praise (not a full stanza) (v. 17)
-superscription:
“A Shiggaion of David, which he sang to the Lord concerning Cush, a Benjaminite.”
“Most likely, the superscription refers to an incident
about David that has been lost… It is clear that the Benjaminites bore ill will to David and his
reign. It is also likely from the psalm that the psalmist is crying to the Lord
because of false words that have been spoken about the psalmist. It is also
worth noting that the psalm was later associated with the Jewish Feast of
Purim, a context in which the ill will and witness of an enemy play a key
role.” (Nancy DeClaissé-Walford,
Rolf A. Jacobson, and Beth Laneel Tanner, The
Book of Psalms [Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 2014), 188).
Exposition
This theme, familiar to us by now in these laments, nevertheless contains
brutal imagery in vv.2 and 5 which is striking and sounds the utter seriousness
of the psalmist. The Selah
(v.5)
asks us to pause and reflect at this point.
Since we are familiar with the theme of God as
Judge in these laments we won’t go section by section through this one. Instead
I will focus on the distinctive contributions this psalm makes to that theme.
-the theme of “righteousness” or “integrity” (v.8).
-the imagery of God’s martial preparations for
engaging David’s enemies (vv.10-13), and
-how evil cannibalizes itself (vv.14-16.
“Righteousness/integrity”
(v.8)
Contrary to what many readers may be inclined to
think, these terms in this kind of context do not focus on personal rectitude
as much as claiming that they belong on God’s side and therefore expect his
positive judgment on their righteousness or integrity.
“Again, it must
be emphasized that the psalmist is not claiming righteousness in the
sense of spiritual perfection or theological self-justification. These
verses are not intended to be a litany of self-righteousness before God. The
psalms know that there is no autonomous independent righteousness on the
basis of which human beings can deal with God (130:3; 143:2). Such prayers
were composed for a person who was in the right in comparison with an antagonist.”
Imagery
of God’s martial preparations for engaging David’s enemies (vv.10-13)
(1) ”will sharpen his sword” –(7:12)
offensive
(2) “will
bend and string his bow” -(7:12)
offensive
(3) “My shield is God Most High” -
(7:10). Defensive weapon – a small shield complementing the larger
shield’s full-body coverage (4)
“makes ready his flaming arrows” (7:13), arrows dipped in pitch or oil and
lit before shooting
David portrays God as
fully armed and prepared to take on and defeat the king’s enemies (see C.
Hassell Bullock, Psalms 1-72, 159).
See comments on use of martial imagery below.
How evil cannibalizes itself
Digging a pit to snare others into which evil-doers themselves fall is
the first image David provides for the ultimate irony and futility of sin
(v.15).
Mischief and violence returning on the heads of evil schemers is the
second image for this (v.16).
This is the ultimate “unintended consequence’ of our (sinful) actions!
Reflection
1.
There is a moral order inscribed by God in his world. This is the “Deep
Magic” of C. S. Lewis’ Narnia. This order provides justice. Evil rebounds on
the heads of its perpetrators, ultimately at least if not in the present moment
and in a tat-for-tat way.
There is also a “Deeper Magic,” a redemptive magic
that both satisfies the truth and rightness of the “Deep Magic” while at the
same time saving those who have run afoul of it. As Christians we affirm the
reign of justice, this “Deep Magic”/moral order, while also announcing and
celebrating the “Deeper Magic” of grace transforming justice into God’s
redemptive order.
2.
God is fully armored and weaponized to enforce his world’s order. Or to
say it differently, God is passionately interested in pursuing the well-being of
his creation. God lends his “full armor” to his people to do battle against
malignant evil powers on side of the cross and resurrection of Jesus
(Eph.6:10-20). Thus we too are fully provisioned for our struggle as those
called to extend and implement the fruits of Christ’s victory.
3.
A piece from my blog on the “military” character of our life as God’s
biblical people:
"The Church is In
Post-Christian Exile – But Should We Really Respond Like It's a War?” is the
title of Karina Kreminski's article on Missio Alliance today. She's responding
to another piece on the church entering Phase Two of our exile and how we
should respond. And her responses are wise and to the point. It's not her
responses, though, that I want to say a few words about. It's the imagery in
her title, “But Should We Really Respond Like It's a War?”
I want to say a
vigorous and unrepentant “Yes” to that image!
First, though, a
clarification or two. I do NOT have in mind actual military conflict or the use
of weapons in any fashion. I'm a pacifist and I believe the church should be
too. Nor do I mean the strident, angry, mean-spirited culture war type of
warfare. Both of these types of conflict are antithetical to participation in
God's mission in the world.
Yet . . . we are in a
war! A war whose decisive and climactic battle has already been won. Our D-Day
happened on Calvary around 30 A.D. We live now in aftermath of Christ's cross
and resurrection awaiting V-Day when Christ returns to finally and fully
establish God's kingdom. Our job is to witness to his victory and authenticate
it by our life together as a sign, sacrament, and servant of that coming
kingdom.
The powers Christ
dealt with are “disarmed” (Col.2:15) and his enemies “defeated” (1
Cor.15:54-57). These enemies are not yet “destroyed” however (1 Cor.15:26), nor
the powers fully pacified. That's why, like the Allied forces between D-Day and
V-Day, our calling as the church is engage the remaining resistance of our
defeated and disarmed foes with declarations an demonstrations of the truth of
the gospel which unveils the defeat of “sin, death, and the (d)evil” and shows
the powers their reign of distorting the conditions for human life and
flourishing is at an end (Eph.3:10).
Our goal is to free
humanity from their bondage to the lies and illusions these enemies and powers
keep assaulting them with. That's really all they can do – keep luring us to
embrace their lies and illusions and continue to live as if Jesus has not won
the victory. Karl Barth sets us straight on this.
“The Easter message
tells us that our enemies, sin, the curse and death, are beaten. Ultimately
they can no longer start mischief. They still behave as though the game were
not decided, the battle not fought; we must still reckon with them, but fundamentally
we must cease to fear them any more. If you have heard the Easter message, you
can no longer run around with a tragic face and lead the humorless existence of
a man who has no hope. One thing still holds, and only this one thing is really
serious, that Jesus is the Victor.” (Dogmatics in Outline, 123)
In fact, in living
free of the lies and illusions God's enemies and the powers use enable us to
show others in word and deed that all of us apart from Christ have common
suprahuman enemies that keep us locked into the tragic and deadly antagonisms
and arrangements that plague our world. Our human oppressor or enemy is not the
enemy we must confront. Instead, the church is called find potential friends in
strangers and enemies. We treat them thus even if they do us hurt or betrayal.
This is how we declare and demonstrate that the power of sin, death, and the
(d)evil are in truth defeated and the powers of distortion and disruption of
God's good order put on notice that their days are numbered.
In fact, in living
free of the enemies and powers that have opposed God in every age and epoch is
“the” chief task of God's people. Whether as families, wandering nomads, a
nation united, a nation divided, a people in exile, a people living under
foreign overlords in their own land, a church spread throughout the earth, in
all these forms God's people are supposed to be what I think can best be called
God's Subversive, Counter-Revolutionary Movement.
Subversive because we
infiltrate and seek change person by person, situation by situation, person to
person. We have no grand scheme by which to organize the world for God from the
top own. The most highly-exalted One did his redeeming work this way, and so
must his people.
Counter-Revolutionary,
even though this is usually a negative terms for us Enlightenment liberals,
because we set ourselves against the attitudes, actions, patterns, and
structures written into the fabric of “the way things are” by the history of
sinful humanity (sin being the original revolution away from God). The twist to
this way of being counter-revolutionary is that we live from the way the world
will be not the way it is or has been.
Israel never quite
lived out this calling. But Jesus Christ did. As the one faithful Israelite he
gathered and still gathers around him all who follow him empowering them with
the Spirit and the gifts necessary for our continuing warfare.
The letter to the
Ephesians give us scriptural warrant to think of our service to Christ in
military terms. Tim Gombis has shown how Paul uses the Divine Warfare pattern
to structure the letter as a call to service in God's ongoing struggle in and
with the world. Andrew Lincoln has demonstrated that the rhetoric of the letter
points us to the familiar “full armor of God” passage in ch.6 as Paul's climax
and “point” in writing. And Thomas Yoder Neufeld has helpfully recovered the
insight that the armor we are to take up is not just that of the Roman soldier
of Paul's time but rather God's own armor he wore to do battle with his enemies
and recalcitrant people in the Old Testament. Together, all these insights make
it inescapable that Ephesians gives us a hermeneutically responsible reflection
on the use of military imagery for a non-violent church.
The virtues of such a
model are the direction, urgency, intentionality, and bodily-ness it gives to
our following Christ. It takes these matters and more to be effective soldiers.
It takes no less for the church to be God's Subversive Counter-Revolutionary
people. A people trained, equipped, and focused on seeking God's shalom as
they “Lift High the Cross” and bear it daily into the nitty-gritty of daily
life – that would be a church that others may still reject. But they would be
rejecting it for the right reasons not the many matters we speculate today
cause people to become “Nones” and “Dones” with regard to the church!
That's why we are
indeed in a war. And why it matters that we know and participate in God's
Subversive Counter-Revolutionary movement. God wants it. In living it out we
discover our true humanity. And the world beholds its own destiny.
4.
David pictures evil or sin as a reproductive process in v.14:
“conceive,” “pregnant,” “bring forth.” Similarly, James 1:14-15 deals with
temptation and sin in reproductive imagery. This vital imagery is one important
way to consider sin. Sin, as an alien power that has us in a death-grip is the
NT perspective that provides a larger horizon for our reflections. At the same
time as we are trapped by sin we also “give birth” to it in ways described by
David and James. We cannot free ourselves from this trap by ourselves. This we
must bring to our reading of the OT as Christians. But once freed by Christ we
can and must resist this devilish “birth cycle” of sin and evil with everything
in us.
How do we resist or short circuit this cycle? Geoff
Holzclaw suggests four possible strategies:
-FLEE IT: Sometimes we are assaulted by
sinful (or at least very unhelpful, unhealthy) messages (from donut shops,
Facebook posts, to violence and porn). These situations require that
we flee, run, change direction, and/or avert our eyes.
-FLIP IT: Sometimes (most of the
time) we are filled with thoughts from within ourselves (from our past
situations or present desires). When they are unhelpful or
unhealthy—or sinful—we need to flip the script and replace the thought with
something else. Sometimes that just means distracting ourselves with
some other task. Sometime it means reaching for God’s word to remember better
thoughts.
-FIGHT IT: Sometimes our
thoughts are not our own (especially the crazy, violent, self-harming, or
shockingly sinful). These thoughts are attacks from the devil. You
can’t flee them or just flip them. You must fight them with the
sword of the Spirit—which is the word of God (Eph. 6:17).
-FAN IT: Speaking of the word of God,
we must fan into flame the words of truth spoken about us and over us. Primarily
these are words of delight and acceptance in Christ, “You are my son/daughter,
and in you I am well pleased (http://geoffreyholsclaw.net/4-ways-taking-every-thought-captive/?fbclid=IwAR0nNbJGxxJIxmci6dykqGYBT7UXGFPJyvoq-Qia4Bwj671sq4NBBzxpXaM).
Comments
Post a Comment