The War of Words on Abortion
I’m pro-life. But
many people describe me based on what I’m against, not what I’m for.
By Charles
C. Camosy
Mr. Camosy is a board member of Democrats for Life of
America
Jan.
9, 2019
The struggle in the abortion debate is,
in many ways, a struggle over language.
For example, I am pro-life. I strongly
support rights and protections for mothers and children, including prenatal
children, and other vulnerable populations. I want to see the laws of this
country protect these people as well. In my view, this makes me pro-life.
That’s why I use the phrase “prenatal child” where other people would say
“fetus.”
In the view of those people, and of
mainstream news outlets, I am not pro-life; I am anti-abortion. This language
allows critics to dismiss me and fellow pro-lifers as single-issue obsessives,
which we are not.
In recent years abortion-rights
supporters moved from using neutral language like “autonomy” and “choice”
toward using positive, stigma-defying language. Groups like Planned Parenthood
now speak
about “abortion care.” Oprah profiled
activists who urge people to #ShoutYourAbortion. Billboards erected
by abortion-rights supporters proudly say that abortion is a “family value.”
Defying
stigma is one thing. But the stakes of this debate are never higher than when
we decide on language to describe the object of abortion.
Read more at https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/09/opinion/abortion-pro-life.html?fbclid=IwAR2opzVSbrFHUtwuiZActQFCzKLRBerssNN0IucHeZFU-j57s14qDRaD6DM
Comments
Post a Comment