The “Magic Eye” of the Bible
The Strangeness of the Bible
Novelist Franz Kafka writes about the kind of
the book we humans need, books that make a real difference to us and in us. In a letter by Franz Kafka to his schoolmate Oskar Pollak,
on January 27, 1904, he says:
“I think we ought to read only the kind of
books that wound and stab us. If the book we're reading doesn't wake us up with
a blow on the head, what are we reading it for? So that it will make us happy,
as you write? Good Lord, we would be happy precisely if we had no books, and
the kind of books that make us happy are the kind we could write ourselves if
we had to. But we need the books that affect us like a disaster, that grieve us
deeply, like the death of someone we loved more than ourselves, like being
banished into forests far from everyone, like a suicide. A book must be the axe
for the frozen sea inside us. That is my belief.”
Karl Barth, the
great 20th century theologian, discovered this truth in the early 20th
century. Barth was schooled in the thought of 19th century liberalism. This
liberalism eschewed this self-involving character of the Bible in favor of
treating it as primarily a historical source for the development of Jewish and
Christian religion. Its input then needed to be reinterpreted in the light of
the best thought of the day. Christianity devolved into a struggle for moral
and social improvement. Barth rudely discovered this when he learned that most
of his revered teachers had signed on to support the Kaiser’s war policy that
lead to World War I. He realized at that moment that his theological education
in liberalism was bankrupt. He had to start anew. He returned to the Bible and
asked: What do we really find in the Bible anyway?
History?
Morality?
Religion?
Barth discovered
it contained none of these things. Rather a “strange new world” opened up to
him as he read. A new world that opened itself up to him calling him to
participate in it himself. This new world testifies to a history with its
own distinct grounds and possibilities, a wholly different kingdom with
its own moral logic and politics. Faith cannot be traced to any historical
foundations. The Bible is fundamentally concerned with God not with our morality,
our knowledge, or our religion. It’s God’s history and God’s reign that
matters. Far from leading us away from this world, Barth claims deriving our
identity and vocation from the Biblical stories and teachings leads us deeper
into the truth of this world. The Bible witnesses to the divine perspective
on humanity, the world, and our life in it. God in Christ has inaugurated a
new reality, a new world amidst the old world of sin and death and that the
Holy Spirit “will not stop nor stay until all that is dead has been brought to
life and a new world has come into being” (Karl Barth, The Word of God and the Word of Man [New
York, NY: Harper & Row, Publishers, 1956], 50.
This strangeness
of the Bible, however, is not just due to the factors noted above. There is
another reason, a more sinister reason, why we find the Bible strange. That’s
because as sinners, those in active revolt against God, desperately clinging to
control of our own lives, “we suppress the truth” (Rom.1:18) God has given us.
It becomes a language we no longer speak, a dialect we no longer understand, a
way of living we can no longer fathom. Until we first face the Bible as the
witness to a strange, unknown reality, God, and seek reconciliation to him
through the one it witnesses to, we can make no progress in reading the Bible
in healing and fruitful ways.
The Magic Eye
In his study of
the problem of violence In relation to Christ’s revelation of a pacific God
Greg Boyd uses the image of “Magic Eye” pictures to illustrate his hermeneutic,
or way of reading the Bible. Such pictures
“look like a boring
page of wallpaper patterns until you look at them in a particular way. When you
don’t look at the patterns, but through the patterns, a 3D image that you
couldn’t see before suddenly appears. So long as you look for the image as
though it was on the same plain as the patterns, existing alongside of, or in
competition with, the patterns, you won’t see it. Only when you look through
them and into a dimension behind the patterns does the entirely different
reality of the 3D image appear” (http://reknew.org/2012/10/a-cruciform-magic-eye/).”
I think this a
great image though I use it a bit differently than Boyd does. The patterns are
the surface data of the scriptures – the events, stories, laws, poems,
characters, prophecies, etc. some of this data had already been shaped into
certain patterns (e.g. the Pentateuch, The Psalter, the Book of the Twelve, the
Passion Narrative, Jesus’ teaching in Matthew in terms of content, and form and
redaction criticism, and literary readings in terms of method). These things
are what we discern in careful, critical readings of the biblical text.
Such readings,
though, often end up discerning no overarching unity to these 66 books. Denying
an overall unity and settling for a diversity in terms of form and content
these surface readings leave us with a holy book that is not suitable for
pastoral, communal, or personal use.
This is looking for the image “as though it was on the same plain as the
patterns, existing alongside of, or in competition with, the patterns.”
But if we “look
through” these surface patterns in all their diversity and individual
peculiarities in prayerful expectancy, we find an “entirely different reality”
that ties the Bible together. That deeper reality in the text takes shape
around the discernment of the ultimate design, its embryonic beginnings in the
creation stories (Gen.1-2) and it fulfillment pictured in Rev.21-22. Around
these two poles the rest of the story is woven in its intricate and meandering
way. Each part of the story can be understood according to its surface features
and also the ways in which being part of this larger, deeper story confirms,
challenges, and transforms these parts (this, I take it, is the central points
of a canonical reading). Phyllis Bird writes
“What
holds the Scriptures together is the community that created, preserved, and
transmitted the writings, Israel and its daughter, the church. United in
canonical form, the Scriptures present an overarching story that moves from the
beginning of creation to a vision of new creation and, with that framework, the
conversation of the community about the implications of that story for its
life. That conversation spans a millennium in its recorded memory, but it does
not end with the last canonical writing; it continues today, as the story
itself continues” (Homosexuality, Science, and the “Plain Sense” of
Scripture [ed. David Balch, 2000], 144-145).
The unity here
is not formal, like a jig-saw puzzle, where each piece fits together with
perfect symmetry to its surrounding pieces, and whole fits together like a
finished picture within its symmetrical boundaries. This unity is more like a
symphony with different parts of the orchestra playing their parts in consonance
or sometimes in dissonance with one another. Walter Brueggemann’s subtitled his
theology of the Old Testament Testimony,
Dispute, Advocacy. This is the kind of back and forth-ness I envision in
the biblical symphony.
Biblical Bookends
As noted above,
the creation stories in Gen.1-2 and the fulfilment vision in Rev.21-22
“bookend” the whole biblical story. We
learn from them that the whole drama is about God’s presence with his people in
the creation he made for hosting their fellowship. Both tales reveal that
-the temple is the
heart of this story. The creation stories are divine temple building stories.
Where else would a deity live but in a temple? A multitude of details point in
that direction (https://derekzrishmawy.com/2012/12/07/9-reasons-the-garden-of-eden-was-a-temple/). The vision of the Seer in Rev.21-22 shows us
a new city, the New Jerusalem, the people of God, who are presented in cubic
shape. The only other structure so shaped in scripture is the Holy of Holies in
Solomon’s temple. From a Garden temple to a world-wide Holy of Holies. The
whole creation is the site of divine-human fellowship.
-human beings are God’s
royal priests who represent and reflect God’s will and way throughout creation
and protect and nurture the creation (Gen.2:15). The Revelator notes at the end
of his vision that the saints will “reign forever and ever” (Rev.22:5). Both
highlight the crucial God-given roles in the governance and maintenance of the
creation.
-the earth is the site
of this divine-human fellowship. The Bible allows no dualism between heaven and
earth, the spiritual and the material such that the former of each pair are
played off against the latter of each pair as superior and eternal.
Created for
fellowship with God and one another, called to play special roles in the
extension and practice of that fellowship, and oriented to life on this good
creation – the Bible tells the intimate, complex, and torturous story of how
God worked out this purpose in and through Israel and that one faithful
Israelite Jesus of Nazareth and his followers, the church.
So, the presence
of God with us, for us, and as us is the point of the biblical story. It takes
shape as human beings bearing God’s image and serving as his royal priests in
the temple of his creation. And it’s tethered firmly to terra firma (not heaven, or some other kind spiritualized existence)
but life here resurrection bodies on the earth as it was always meant to be. In
short, we will finally live the lives God intended us too! This is what we see
when we look “through” and into a dimension behind the patterns” on the surface
of the biblical texts.
The Biblical Story Line
This deeper
reality, the “it” the Bible is about, unfolds along a coherent and
comprehensive story line. After the creation stories, the first act in the
biblical drama, a catastrophe occurs that seems to derail God’s purpose. This
second act of the drama, sin, unfolds with ever-widening ripples, over
Gen.3-11. Act three begins by articulating the story line that will not only
resolve the complications introduced by sin but also effect a restoration of
creature and creation to God’s original purposes for them. This story is found
in Gen.12:1-3. There God promises to raise up a great people through Abraham
and Sarah, to bless and protect that people, and through them bless everyone
else in the world.
This threefold
story line, later called the Abrahamic Covenant reveals God’s basic strategy
for reclaiming and restoring his creation to his purposes. God will raise up a
people and in and through them work out the salvation and well-being of the
world. By working with this people and vesting them to bear the blessing of the
world, this people becomes the world’s destiny. What happens to and through it
happens to the world.
And why does God work through one
small and unreliable (if truth be told) people? Gerhard Lohfink points us in
the right direction, I think.
“God, like all revolutionaries, desires
the overturning, the radical alteration of the whole society—for in this the
revolutionaries are right: what is at stake is the whole world, and the change
must be radical, for the misery of the world cries to heaven and it begins deep
within the human heart. But how can anyone change the world and society at its
roots without taking away freedom?
“It can only be that God begins in a small
way, at one single place in the world. There must be a place, visible,
tangible, where the salvation of the world can begin: that is, where the world
becomes what it is supposed to be according to God’s plan. Beginning at that
place, the new thing can spread abroad, but not through persuasion, not through
indoctrination, not through violence. Everyone must have an opportunity to come
and see. All must have the chance to behold and test this new thing. Then, if
they want to, they can allow themselves to be drawn into the history of
salvation that God is creating. Only in that way can their freedom be preserved.
What drives them to the new thing cannot be force, not even moral pressure, but
only the fascination of a world that is changed.
“Clearly this change in the world must
begin in human beings, but not at all by their seeking through heroic effort to
make themselves the locus of the new, altered world; rather it begins when they
listen to God, open themselves to God, and allow God to act” (Lohfink, Does God
Need the Church? Toward a Theology of the People, [Collegeville: Liturgical,
1999], 27).
The Abrahamic
Covenant is repeated and reaffirmed many times throughout scripture – to Isaac,
and Jacob, in the Psalms, the prophets, by Jesus, and the Apostle Paul, and
Revelation. The “covenant formula,” repeated in both Old and New Testament
reinforces this story line.
From Garden
Temple to the garden within the new Holy of Holies (the New Jerusalem) the
story line is driven by three themes. Divine presence is primary and symbolized
in the temple and its predecessors. Covenant (family) and kingdom (rule) carry
the story line forward and both are the condition and find their fulfillment in
God’s presence.
Covenant
(family) structures the story. From Creation (implicitly) to Abraham to Moses
to David to the prophecy of the New Covenant in Jeremiah and all the covenant’s
fulfillment in Jesus and through him the church limns out the story.
Kingdom is also
implicit in the creation. God is Israel’s King after the Exodus. Human kingship
was never mandated but only allowed. And when we discover the people’s desire
for a human monarch is ultimately a rejection of YHWH’S rule over them, we
learn why. Nevertheless, God accepts the people’s (sinful) desire and
integrates it into his purpose of reclaiming and restoring his people and
creation through the covenant with David. As Jesus fulfills kingdom and
kingship he turns it on its head and reshapes it through his practice of
kingship and announcement of kingdom. Kingdom/kingship carries us into the
heart of the story.
Reading the Story Today
To read the story today we need first
to be clear about what kind of book the Bible is. Trevor Hart offers an
illuminating typology. He suggests the dominant ways of conceiving of scripture
are three:
-as a window
-as a mirror
-as stained-glass art.
As a window we look through the Bible
to see what lies behind it. That is, search for history that is in it and how
that squares with history as we know it from other sources (which is not all
that much, truth be told). The relative
paucity of data limits this approach as the main one we take to reading the
Bible and the tendency of historians (or theologians who act a historian) to
reconstruct what they think was the case and to use that reconstruction.
Historical research yields much insight in terms of the backgrounds to the
biblical culture and it neighboring cultures, languages, thought, customs,
taboos, and the like. Avoiding basing our theology on historical
reconstructions, however, is a necessity. Even where historical research posits
a different picture at points than the biblical story this is a reminder that
the historical accuracy is not a prime motive or the point of biblical authors.
That said, the
biblical story rests on the conviction that God has acted in history through
his own history-creating acts, the people of Israel, Jesus, and the church. My
conviction is that the basic story line is historically credible; and the core
events of exodus, crucifixion and resurrection are crucial to that credibility.
That the biblical authors and editors felt free to reshape and even rearrange
parts of the story to make other points clear or follow literary conventions
that do not depend on historical narration will be clearer as we make our way
through Hart’s typology.
If a window
invites us to look through it to what lies behind, our second image for the
Bible, a mirror invites us to look
at what lies in front of the text, the reflection of ourselves we see.
It’s our issues and struggles, our lives, which are the chief concerns in this
type of Bible reading. There are many and varied types of this approach, both
sophisticated and simple. Some versions of reader response theory in
literature, in which the reader creates the meaning of the story, and much
devotional reading of the Bible, which seeks to find a direct word of personal
meaning for uplift, inspiration, or guidance for the day’s activities and
challenges. In each case, the reader’s interest lies in front of the text
on themselves, their situations and questions, needs and desires, for which
they seek insight and guidance.
Now finding
meaning in the Bible for our lives is crucial. We just don’t find it by framing
the Bible’s meaning in terms of our lives and issues or our search for meaning.
Rather as we will see next, the key is to read ourselves into the Bible’s story
and discover our lives and the Bible’s meaning there. George Lindbeck puts it
like this:
“It does not suggest, as is often said
in our day, that believers find their stories in the Bible, but rather that
they make the story of the Bible their own story. The cross is not to be viewed
as a figurative representation of suffering nor the messianic kingdom as a
symbol for hope in the future; rather, suffering should be cruciform, and hopes
for the future messianic . . . Intratextual theology redescribes reality within
the scriptural framework rather than translating Scripture into extrascriptural
categories. It is the text, so to speak, which absorbs the world, rather than
the world the text” (The
Nature of Doctrine, ---).
That brings us
to Hart’s third image for the Bible, stained-glass
art. Here one reads the Bible in accord with its own intent and purpose by
looking at the story inscribed in the text. And that story is one long
sprawling story. It tells this story through many authors, most of them
unknown. Further editors shaped the Bible into its final form. It contains many
genres and styles of writing. Different views are found in its pages, due
largely to the vast span of time the Bible covers. Ample diversity of form and
thought must be factored into any viable view of the Bible. Like a piece of
stained-glass, composed of different sizes and colors of glass that are used to
tell a story, these diverse genres, styles, views, are put to similar use by
biblical authors.
That the Bible
is amenable to historical probing of its narrative in only somewhat limited
ways turns out, surprisingly, not to be a liability but an indication of rather
the very raison d’ệtre for it. The story told
in scripture is the story we must attend to. In it we find we true story and
the gifts of identity, significance, and security. The biblical story is drawn
from stories many of which were told, retold, and told again around a fire at
night in Israel’s settlements. They assumed a particular form through these
retellings and recorded according to certain literary conventions of the time
which were not interested recounting events as the father of modern
historiography, Leopold von Ranke, believed “as they actually happened.”
Another factor
was the use of these stories in worship. For this use they were subjected to a
liturgical shaping, which again, did not depend on historical accuracy. The
stories of the Exodus in Ex.14-15 seem reflect this use in worship. One Jewish
writer spells this out:
“The secret of the impact of the Exodus is that it does not
present itself as ancient history, a one-time event. Since the key way to
remember the Exodus is reenactment, the event offers itself as an ongoing
experience in human history. As free people relive the Exodus, it turns memory
into moral dynamic. The experience of slavery that breaks and crushes slaves does not destroy free
people. It evokes feelings of repulsion and determination to help others escape
that state” (https://www.myjewishlearning.com/article/the-exodus-effect/).
The Eucharist in
the New Testament functions in the same way: to represent for a re-experience
of the rite’s capacity to ignite recognition of and service to Jesus. The story
of the travelers on the way to Emmaus in Lk.24 shows clear signs of this kind
of liturgical shaping.
The type of
reading proposed by Lindbeck above is well illustrated by Michael Ende’s The Neverending Story (Michael
Ende, The Neverending Story (Penguin Books;
New Ed edition, 1984). A young boy, Bastian, is suffering the loss of
his mother, his father’s emotional distance, and his feeling of not fitting in
anywhere, especially at school. He loved to read, though. One day he skipped
out on school and went to bookstore and nicked The Neverending Story returning
to the school’s attic to read it. As he read about the travails of the book’s
magical country Fantastica Bastian learned of its losing battle against an
encroaching Nothing. Reading further Bastian discovered that he himself is in
the story and characters in it summon him to come to the troubled country’s
aid. Finally he heeds this summons and joins Fantastica’s struggle. Through the
adventures and misadventures he undergoes there Bastian discovers his true
identity and the capacity to love. He returns to our world a changed, more mature
boy and reconciles with his father. This is the kind of reading befitting a
book of this kind. It registers its truth on and in us by this call to embrace
this story as our life’s meaning and, indeed, the meaning of the world. This is
what John Calvin referred to as the internal witness of the Holy Spirit to
scripture’s truth and reality.
We need to
search history to understand the backgrounds, beliefs, and kinds of lives
ancient people led in Bible times. We must also search these pages for the
meaning and purpose of our lives. But both of these exercises find their point
in our ability to read the book as a work of stained-glass art.
The Magic Eye Again
The Magic
Eye of the Bible reveals its strangeness, biblical bookends that orient us to
the meta-story the Bible is telling, its historical – narrative story line and
constituent elements, and the necessity of reading it as a piece of
stained-glass art.
It is too
easy to get lost in the trees of the Bible and lose or never gain sight of the
forest. Just starting to read from Gen.1:1 and hoping to get through to the end
of Rev.22 (most who do this fail to make it through, I suspect) will yield
greater knowledge of what’s in the Bible (and that’s a good thing). But it will
not get us above the trees to catch a glimpse of the forest.
The proposal
suggested in this essay is a way I believe to glimpse that forest before lunging
in to the trees. It focuses our attention in a way that enables us to grasp “the
thing” scripture is truly about. A map through the forest that enables us to identify
to trees and hew to the path through them that leads us to their destination (and
our destiny).
Comments
Post a Comment