Nonviolence
in the Face of ISIS?
By Micah Bales
03-04-2015
A couple of folks I really respect – Kate Gould of Friends Committee on National
Legislation (aka, the Quaker Lobby), and Jim Wallis of Sojourners – were recently on the O’Reilly Factor. For those of you who
don’t watch cable news, this is a television program where Bill O’Reilly
basically screams at people and incites hatred of anything non-white, non-rich,
and non-Republican. I normally don’t watch the show. But when I heard that Kate
and Jim were going to be talking, I tuned in.
I knew almost immediately this wasn’t going to be good.
It’s Bill’s program, so he gets to frame the question. Here’s what he asks: Do
Christian pacifists have a solution for stopping ISIS?
It’s the wrong question.
O’Reilly knows it’s the wrong question, and that’s why
he’s asking it. Both Gould and Wallis attempt to answer his question directly
and rationally. Gould presents an argument for diplomatic measures to curb
ISIS’ support. Wallis tries to explain that O’Reilly’s rhetoric of holy war will only lead to a wider
conflagration and cost more lives.
- See more at:
https://sojo.net/articles/nonviolence-face-isis#sthash.Zm6KE6DL.dpuf
Comments
Post a Comment