Bonhoeffer on Reading Scripture
Dear Rüdiger
. . . I will first of all
quite simply make a confession: I believe that the Bible alone is the answer to
all our questions and that we need only to ask insistently and with some
humility for us to receive the answer from it. One cannot simply read the Bible
like other books. We must be prepared really to question it. Only in this way
is it revealed to us. Only if we await the final answer from it does it give
that Word to us. The reason for this is that in the Bible God speaks to us. And
we cannot simply reflect upon God from ourselves; rather, we must ask God. Only
when we seek God does God answer. Naturally one can also read the Bible like any
other book, as for example from the viewpoint of textual criticism, etc. There
is certainly nothing to be said against this. Only that it is not the way that
reveals the essence of the Bible, only its superficial surface. Just as we do
not grasp the word of a person whom we love, in order to dissect it, but just as
such a word is simply accepted and it then lingers with us all day long, simply
as the word of this person whom we love, and just as the one who reveals himself
to us as the one who has spoken to us in this word that moves us ever more deeply
in our hearts like Mary, so should we treat
the Word of God. Only if we dare for once to enter into relationship with
the Bible as the place where the God who loves us really speaks to us and will
not leave us alone with our questions will we be happy with the Bible. . . .
If I am one who says where God shall be, so I will always
find a God there who corresponds in some way to me, is pleasing to me, who
belongs to my nature. If it is, however, God who speaks where God chooses to
be, then that will probably be a place which does not at all correspond to my
nature, which is not at all pleasing to me. But this place is the cross of
Christ. And the one who will find him there must be with him under this cross,
just as the Sermon on the Mount demands. This doesn't suit our nature at all
but is completely counter to it. This, however, is the message of the Bible,
not only in the New but also in the OId Testament (Isa. 53!). In any event, Jesus
and Paul intended this with the cross of Jesus is the Scripture, that is, the OId
Testament, fulfilled. The whole Bible will, therefore, be the Word in which God
will allow the divine self to be discovered by us. This is no place which is
pleasing or apriori sensible to us, but a place strange to us in every way and which
is entirely contrary to us. But this is the very place God has chosen to
encounter us.
So I now read the Bible in this way. I ask in every
place: What is God saying to us here? I ask God to show us what God wants to say.
Thus we are not at all permitted to seek after general, eternal truths which would
correspond to our own "everlasting" nature and as such would be made
evident. Rather, we seek the will of God who is entirely strange and contrary
to us, whose ways are not our ways and whose thoughts are not our thoughts, who
hides under the sign of the cross at which all our ways and thoughts come to an
end. God is wholly, other than the so-called eternal truth. That is always
still our own thoughts of self and our wished-for life everlasting. God's Word,
however, begins where God points us to the cross of Jesus at which all our ways
and thoughts, also the so-called "everlasting" converge, namely in
death and God's judgment. Is it in any way intelligible to you, if I won't at
any point be willing to sacrifice the Bible as this strange Word of God, that,
on the contrary, I ask with all my strength what God wants to say to us here?
Everything outside the Bible has become too uncertain for me. I am afraid only
of running into a heavenly double of myself. Is it also comprehensible to you
that I am rather ready for a sacrifice of my intellect (sacrifcium intellectus)
even in these matters and only in these matters, that is, in the sight of the
God of truth? And who would not in fact bring his or her own sacrifice of
intellect into such a situation, that is, with the acknowledgment one does not
yet understand this or that place of the Scripture, in the awareness that even
this will one day be revealed as God's own Word? I would rather do this than
only to say, following some suitable opinion: "This is divine, that is
human."
I also want to say to you quite personally that since I
have learned to read the Bible in this way - and that is not so very long ago -
it becomes more wonderful to me every day. I read it every morning and evening,
often also during the day. And every day I take for myself a text that I will
have for the entire week and attempt to immerse myself entirely in it, in order
to be able to really listen to it. I know that without this I would no longer
be able to live properly. Or, even before that, to believe in the right way.
(Gessamelte Schriften III, 26-29)
Comments
Post a Comment