Theological Journal – November 13 The Radical Middle – Geoff Holsclaw

It is clear the church must find a way to help mediate the tensions and oppositions ripping or culture apart. But is there a way to do that, a way to be a reconciled and reconciling body in a time like ours? Pastor and theologian Geoff Holsclaw offers four possibilities for consideration (http://geoffreyholsclaw.net/four-definitions-of-the-radical-middle-or-why-it-isnt-for-wishy-washy-wimps/).

Option #1: Holding the Tension

This kind of radical middle holds together what most people think are opposites, irreconcilable differences.  This is the practical view that comes from understanding that Jesus is fully God and fully human (not just 50/50 of each), or the reality that we “already” live in God’s new kingdom, while it is “not yet” fully realized.  

Option #2: Via Media (Middle Way)

This option finds the middle between two extreme, values moderation over excess. Truth be told, this way does seem to perpetuate false moderation, let’s ignore our differences by watering things down a bit. 

Option #3: Break the Framework

This option says that the two sides often hold something fundamental in agreement— ignored by both. The “radical middle” is to actually break free from these assumptions (break the framework) and move into a new space, a space which is misunderstood and criticized by both sides in the old framework.   The framework thinks it is position “A” fighting position “B”.  Those who break with the framework see that position “A” is fight with its opposite, (“not-A”), and that only by moving on from both do we get to position “B”.

Option #4: See the Humanity

This option affirms that all people should be treated as humans — humanely.  It understands that the world and people are complex.  This option believes you can hold strong convictions and share compassion for others.  This last option can be watered down as cover for the status quo, false moderation, and calls to “be nice” in the via media approach (option #2).  Or it can be part of the revolution of breaking the frame (option #3).  

What do you think?