“Why Public Prayer Before Football Games is a Bad ldea"
Since this issue has arisen again recently, I decided to repost this sermon from a decade or so ago. I would say some things differently today but I continue to believe what I say here.
(Exodus 19:1-6; lsaiah 43:14-21; I Peter 2:1-1O)
I know I face an uphill
battle in today's sermon. I suspect many of you are disappointed and/or alarmed
by my title: “Why Public Prayer Before Football Games is a Bad ldea."
Others are puzzled. A few of you may even agree, though almost certainly not
for the same reasons I will give. So, like I said, l've got an uphill battle
today.
Let me say this right off the
top: Though I am certainly not deliberately trying to provoke or upset anyone,
it is my pastoral responsibility to help you reflect theologically on what goes
on in the world around you. And that's what I'm going to try to do. It won’t be
easy because the Fifth Circuit Court's ruling of pre-game public prayer unconstitutional
has stirred emotions to a fever pitch - on all sides. Add to that a dash of
nostalgia and a pinch of inadequate theology - and you have a situation that resists
reasoned discussion. So, I don't pretend to think I'm going to persuade all or
perhaps any of you of what I will say on first hearing. I do hope, though, to
plant some seeds that will bear fruit somewhere down the road.
Let me also say that
through this issue we will touch on the deepest roots of the church's distress
in North America. lf you want to know why we are in the shape we are in in this
country, you'll find out this morning. That’s why it is imperative for you to
listen over, around, or through your immediate reaction to what I say. This is
incredibly important stuff!
And one other thing: I love God's church. With
everything in me I love her and long for her to be and do what God call's her
to be and do. And what we will talk about this morning is more directly
responsible for her troubles in this country than anything else. That bothers
me - a lot! I take it personally. I get passionate about it. ln fact, any hope
we have of forging a viable church and witness ln the next century hinges on coming
to terms with it So what I share with you this morning comes from as deep in my
heart as I can go. And I risk disappointing or upsetting some of you by sharing
it simply because it matters so terribly much!
I want to share with you the learnings I have come to
over the last 20-25 years. I came out of college with three majors - history,
Bible, and Greek. I covered a lot of ground in those four years! And learned a
lot. But I never found an answer for my gut feeling that something was wrong,
dreadfully wrong, in the church. I struggled to learn and experience as much as
I could in Seminary and after, as I worked in a national ministry, and a campus
ministry, and then a local church. I wrestled to better understand that gut
feeling that just never went away. And through much reading and reflection,
nearly twenty years of ministry, some tears, many disappointments and a few glorious
moments, I've gotten much closer to understanding it. Here's some of what I've learned.
Let me start by identifying the real issue at stake
here. I stood at the concession stand on Friday night at halftime of the Pine
Tree - Crockett game and listened to the Crockett parents behind the counter
bemoaning the court's decision to ban the public pre-game prayer. One of them
said, 'At feast we always used to be able to pray!" And I wanted to say to
her, "Who's stopping you? Who could stop you? We can pray anywhere,
anytime, and in any situation we want to - and nobody has the power to stop us.
The court's decision certainly can't. That is a basic biblical insight about
prayer. So if you want to pray, pray! Bow your head, or close your eyes, or
gather a group of like-minded folks in the stands and pray. What the court has
done is to prohibit a certain form of prayer on a particular occasion but has
done and can do nothing about whether other forms of prayer are offered on that
occasion!
So, you see, prayer is not
really what the fuss is all about. What it is really about is a certain form of
prayer - a publically acknowledged and officially sanctioned verbal prayer offered to the Christian God at a civic
gathering. Let me say that again – a publically acknowledged and officially
sanctioned verbal prayer offered to the Christian God at a civic gathering. I
say "the Christian God" because I’d be willing to bet a month's
salary that the vast majority of those reacting against the court's ruling
aren't interested in having a Jew, a Moslem, a Hindu, a Buddhist or someone
from any other faith offer the pregame prayer. lf only one or two games in ten
features a Christian prayer, I strongly suspect these folks would quickly turn
and support the silent prayer option.
Be that as it may, what
these well-meaning folks desperately want (whether they realize it or not!) is
to retain any gesture or ritual that reassures them that this country is indeed
God's country - a Christian nation. Woven deep into our national history and psyche
runs the conviction that in a way different from any other people, God loves
and blesses us North Americans. To put it simply, we are God's favorites. And
he has destined us for special work and special privilege. What is good for
North America is also good for God! And
correspondingly, when we decline, God's plan and work in the world takes a hit
too!
And today we are afraid
that we are indeed in decline. We long for public gestures supporting the
Christian faith as a way to deal with our FEAR! Our fear, fear that the world
we thought we knew and controlled is or has already slipped away from us. Fear
that the societal props for our faith we've grown used to, like public prayer before
football games, are no longer there. Fear that perhaps we no longer are, and maybe
never really were, a Christian nation, specially blessed by God and destined to
be a "city set on a hill," "a light to the nations."
And in our fear we reach
out to what we know. And we try to
insist on recovering or holding on to symbols and gestures of the past we wish
the present was. And whether it be our current concern, or prayer in public
school classrooms, or creches on the lawns of public buildings at Christmas
time - the same fear fuels them all. We desperately seek some way to wrest from
our now thoroughly secular world some public acknowledgment that we are a
Christian nation. But even in the Bible Belt, such things are rapidly passing
away. And we have no experience and little idea of how to live, worship, and
serve in a world that now neither acknowledges nor supports our faith. Little
wonder that we fear!
"Sometime between 1960
and 1980, an old, inadequately conceived world ended and a fresh, new world
began." So writes Stanley Hauerwas and Will Willimon in their book Resident Aliens. They continue, 'We do
not mean to be overly dramatic. Although
there are many who have not yet heard the news, it is neveftheless true: A
tired old world has ended,
an exciting new one is awaiting recognition ...
“When and how did we
change? Although it may sound trivial, one of us is tempted to date the shift
sometime on a Sunday evening in 1963. Then in Greenville, South Carolina, in
defiance of the state's time-honored blue laws, the Fox Theater opened on
Sunday. Seven of us - regular attenders of the Methodist Youth Fellowship at
Buncombe Street Church - made a pact to enter the front door of the church, be seen
then quietly slip out the back door and join John Wayne at the Fox.
"That evening has
come to represent a watershed... On that night, Greenville, South Carolina ...
served notice that it would no longer be a prop for the church. There would be
no more free passes, no more free rides. The Fox Theater went head to head with
the church over who would provide the world view for the young. That night in
1963, the Fox Theater won the opening skirmish" (pp. 15-16).
And in this late summer of
1999 the Fifth Circuit Court in Texas fired a similar salvo, in line with other
court decisions decreeing that the institutions and agencies of American
society will not sponsor religion of any kind. But since the Christian faith is
the one it has informally sponsored since the founding of the country, the
thrust of the decision is aimed right at the church.
We are under attack,
folks. Our culture and its institutions require of us attitudes, habits, and
behaviors that are in many cases diametrically opposed to the will and way of
our God made known in Jesus Christ. lt's been that way from the beginning,
though the peculiar circumstances of our origin cast a Christian veneer over it
that has only recently been stripped away. The secular, pagan principles which
have effectively and decisively shaped the character of this country have
finally declared themselves openly.
But in that stripping
away, things become clear again for the church! We see, perhaps for the first
time, what it might mean for the church to be the church in America.
Fundamental issues are at
stake here.
We reformed folk have been
through this before in our history. A
number of times. And our tradition gives us resources to help us recover our identity
and integrity as God's "holy nation" in the midst of a pagan culture. I call your attention to a 1934 document in
our Book of Confessions entitled “The
Theological Declaration of Barmen." Written in the midst of the struggle
with Nazism in Germany prior to the Second World War, the "Confessing
Church" in Germany delivers a prophetic message fully relevant for our own
time. This "Confessing Church" had separated from the mass of German
Christians who willingly adopted the perspective and directives of the Hitler regime
as compatible with the Christian faith. They clearly saw the error and the danger
of that compromise. And they spoke to it with gospel clarity and urgency. The same
clarity and urgency the church in North America must recover if it is to remain
a viable vehicle for God's work here.
“The Christian Church is
the congregation of the brethren in which Jesus Christ acts presently as the
Lord in Word and sacrament through the Holy Spirit. As the Church of pardoned sinners, it has to
testify in the midst of a sinful world, with its faith as with its obedience,
with its message as with its order, that it is solely his property, and that it
lives and wants to live solely from his comfort and from his direction in the expectation
of his appearance.
“We reject the false doctrine,
as though the Church were permitted to abandon the form of its message and
order to its own pleasure or to changes in prevailing ideological and political
convictions."
You see, friends, I
believe that public prayer before football games is a bad idea because it encourages
us to nurture the illusion that we really do live in a basically Christian
country which we ought to support because it is trying, or at least should be trying,
to do God's will.
The truth of the matter
is, as I have tried to make clear, that the church in North America lives in
the midst of a pagan culture, a culture both secular and religious at the same
time. A culture which until recent years has been happy to hide behind a Christian
veneer by sponsoring things like Christian prayers at civic functions, having the
Ten Commandments posted in public buildings, and creches on courthouse lawns, Now
however, the secular forces driving our country have won the day and they no longer
need to keep up that veneer. Hence the court decision that has thrown us into such
turmoil.
But our God is pretty
resourceful and always has a trick or two up his sleeve. And if the church can
get her head and heart clear about all this by embracing and internalizing the
call of the Barmen Declaration; and stir herself to claim again her heritage
and hope as God's "holy nation," it might just tum out that God uses
the Fifth Circuit Court's decision to shoot the forces of secularism in the
foot with their own bullet!
Wouldn't that be cool! But
that will only happen if we all come to understand why public prayer before
football games is a bad idea. And that's because God has a much better idea.
Alleluia! Jesus is victor!
Amen.
Comments
Post a Comment